TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING FOR ZOOSC PROJECT BASELINE DATA
Kigali, July 2024
1. Table of Contents
2. Introduction
Rwanda has made notable progress in education, achieving near universal primary school enrolment at 98.3%. However, challenges persist, including high repetition rate (10%) and dropout rate (7%) and a low transition rate from primary to lower secondary education (72%). The estimated total number of out-of-school children stands at 177,119, based on the latest data from the Ministry of Education (MINEDUC) and district officials. Save the Children, MINEDUC, and partners (Humanity & Inclusion and NUDOR) aim to address these issues with a comprehensive intervention to ensure universal primary education in Rwanda. The project will focus on improving identification, enrolment, attendance, and retention of children who have been reintegrated the school system, empowering communities, and enhancing data management systems. The consortium will tackle barriers such as financial burden, physical accessibility, and social attitudes towards education, leveraging extensive experience and best practices. The primary objective of this consultancy is to analyse the baseline data collected by the Zero Out Of School Children (ZOOSC) Project and produce a comprehensive, professional report summarizing the findings, insights, and recommendations.
3. Background
To address the gaps and needs relating to out-of-school children and high drop-out rates at the primary grade level, Save the Children, MINEDUC and their partners (Humanity & Inclusion and NUDOR) propose to deliver a comprehensive and coordinated intervention, contributing to the national vision that no child misses out on primary education in Rwanda.
ZOOSC Project goal is to improve access to and retention in equitable primary education for all Rwandan boys and girls, i.e., ensuring that no child misses out on primary school. It was launched on 08 September 2023 and is expected to close by 07 September 2028 and the project with the funding of Educate a Children (EAC).
This goal will be achieved through three outcomes:
4. Purpose of the study
For the project to be able to assess the achievement and success, it must conduct the baseline data to establish the current situation and to provide indicators for monitoring progress and impact assessment of the implementation. The project is conducting baseline assessment for understanding the situation of children out school, the root cause of the problem, and what can be done to resolve the problem. The baseline will go in hand with the identification of children out of school from the community as well as data collection for the children, communities, and education officials on out of school children. In addition, the findings from the survey will be shared to different concerned people for better implementation of project activities.
5. Description and Objectives
This study is hybrid of school-based and household-based survey targeting school officials, parents, teachers, children, community (local leaders, friends of families, community education workers) and other education officials like Sector Education Inspector, District Education Officers and district director of education. This survey aims to answer three fundamental questions pertained to children, factors driving the non-enrolment and dropout as well as practical child-cantered solutions to address this phenomenon. It will be the nationally representative undertaking across all 30 districts countrywide. These questions include:
Additionally, we will also analyse the association, if any, between behavioural, economic, and educational factors and the project outcomes over time (zero out of school children).
5.1. Objectives of the assignment
The Zero Out-of-School Children (ZOOSC) project aims to identify, analyse, and address the barriers preventing children from accessing education. As part of the baseline phase, extensive data collection has been conducted, and we require a skilled consultant to analyse this data and produce a good comprehensive report.
5.2. Main objective of the study
The main objective of the study is to know the status quo, contributing factors and possible labour/activities leading to out of school children in Rwanda.
5.3. Specific Objectives of the Study
This baseline assessment is expected to cover the following objectives:
5.4. Research questions of the study.
6. ZOOSC project indictors to be responded by baseline study.
Indicator |
Indicator Definition |
Data Sources |
Data Collection Tools |
Data Collection Methods |
Disaggregation |
Calculation Method |
# schools with performance indicators relating to the enrolment and retention of OOSC |
Those are schools that have included indicators related to enrolment and retention of OOSC in the performance contracts |
Baseline and School performance contracts |
School records analysis |
Checking the degree to which schools have implemented the performance contracts |
Locations | Count the number of schools that have included indicators related to enrolment and retention of OOSC in their performance contracts |
# schools with functional multidisciplinary committees |
Those are multi-disciplinary committees established to ensure OOSC are identified, enrolled, and retained in primary schools, which are functional at the time of verification. They support the establishment of the School Improvement Plans |
Baseline, midterm and endline assessments |
Field visits and reports on committee activities |
Review of school committee records |
Locations |
Count of schools with functional multidisciplinary committees |
% SIPs that contain plans for improving and/or maintaining the accessibility of infrastructure |
Schools that developed SIPs containing and implementing accessibility of schools |
Baseline, midterm and endline assessments Project Records School needs assessment report |
School Improvement Plan review form |
School Improvement Plan document review |
Location, type of schools |
Numerator: sampled schools with SIPs that contain plans for improving accessibility of infrastructure/all schools Denominator: All schools that developed SIPs |
% participating schools with a quality learning environment |
Schools that have quality learning environments are those meeting 3 out of 5 effective learning environment components including (1) tracking learner’s characteristics, (2) having learning and teaching goals, (3) activities that support learning, (4) assessment strategies tracking learning and a (5) culture that promotes learning |
Baseline, midterm and endline assessments |
SC Quality Learning Environment tool / Checklist |
School observation |
Location, type of institution |
Numerator: sampled schools with quality learning environment Denominator: total # of sampled schools |
# classrooms refurbished |
Those are classrooms rehabilitated to meet security and accessibility requirements |
Baseline, midterm and endline assessment |
Checklists |
Observation using the developed checklist on occasions of staff visits and review the progress against the school improvement plans |
Locations |
Count of classrooms refurbished |
# WASH facilities in schools |
Those include functional latrines, handwashing and girls changing 'rooms |
Baseline, midterm and endline assessment |
Checklists |
Observation using the developed checklist on occasions of staff visits |
Types of facilities, locations and gender segregation |
Count of available WASH facilities |
% children reporting access to safe, inclusive, and enabling learning environment |
Safe, inclusive, and enabling environment should be one that offers children occasion of learning with safety, gender sensitivity and disability inclusiveness |
Baseline, midterm and endline assessments |
Questionnaire |
Enumerator administered questionnaire |
Sex, cohort, location, type of OOSC, disability status |
Numerator: sampled children reporting access to safe, inclusive and enabling learning environment Denominator: total # of sampled children |
% teachers in project schools who demonstrate improved knowledge, attitudes, and practices in promoting retention of OOSC with disabilities |
Those are teachers trained who demonstrate measurable actions that promote inclusive learning outcomes and special needs education for retention of OOSC with disabilities |
KAP survey during baseline, midline and endline assessments |
KAP scores |
KAP survey and observations |
Location, sex, type of schools |
Numerator: sampled trained teachers who demonstrate improved knowledge and practices Denominator: total number of sampled trained teachers |
% caregivers who demonstrate improved knowledge and attitudes in promoting OOSC enrollment and retention |
Those are caregivers attending project awareness campaigns demonstrating improved knowledge and attitudes in promoting OOSC enrollment and retention |
KAP survey during baseline, midline and endline assessments |
KAP scores |
KAP survey, testimonies and FGDs |
Location, sex, category of participants |
Numerator: sampled individuals who demonstrate improved awareness and skills Denominator: total # of sampled individuals |
% caregivers, who demonstrated improved practices related to enrollment and retention of OOSC |
Those are caregivers with concrete actions engaged in enrolling and retaining OOSC to schools |
Baseline, midline and endline assessment reports |
KAP scores |
KAP survey |
Location, sex, category of participants |
Numerator: sampled individuals that demonstrate improved practices related to enrollment and retention of OOSC Denominator: total # of sampled individuals |
Analysis Methods
Descriptive Statistics: Summarize the dataset's main features by calculating measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and variability (standard deviation, variance, range). Utilize frequency distributions, percentages, and create graphical representations such as bar charts, pie charts, and histograms to visualize the data.
Inferential Statistics: Apply confidence intervals to estimate population parameters and assess whether observed differences are statistically significant. Use statistical tests such as t-tests and chi-square tests to determine if the results are significant and generalizable to the population.
Regression Analysis and Comparative Analysis: Perform regression analyses (both linear and logistic) to explore relationships between variables and predict outcomes. Interpret the coefficients to understand the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable. Conduct comparative analysis using ANOVA or similar methods to compare means across multiple groups and use correlation coefficients to assess the strength and direction of relationships between variables.
Summary Table of study participants and the names of dataset
# |
Study Participants |
Details |
Data Collection Tools and Methods |
Types of Data |
01 |
Parents with children who are not in school |
Parents of children who have dropped out or never attended school |
|
Quantitative |
02 |
Parents with children that are currently attending school |
Parents of children currently attending school |
|
Quantitative |
03 |
Children who dropped out and/or have not attended school and children in school |
Children aged 6–18 years who dropped out or never attended, and children in school |
|
Quantitative |
04 |
Children who are currently in school |
Children currently attending school |
Focus Group Discussion (FGD) |
Qualitative |
05 |
Key Informants |
Cell Executive Secretary, Head Teachers, DOS, Village Leaders, etc. |
|
Qualitative |
06 |
School Leaders |
Head Teachers |
|
Quantitative |
07 |
Teachers |
Teachers currently employed at the schools |
|
Quantitative |
6. Scope of Work
6.1. Data Analysis
Review and clean the ZOOSC Baseline data.
6.2. Report Writing:
6.3. Presentation:
6.4. Deliverables:
6.5. Payment Terms:
# |
Payment Phase |
Amount (%) |
Conditions |
01 |
Phase I |
40% |
1st Draft of Report |
02 |
Phase II |
60% |
After approval of the Final Report |
6.6. Timeline
The whole process of data analysis and report writing of ZOOSC Project Baseline Study should be completed within 30 days in total of which the consultant will use no more than 10 days to do actual data cleaning, analysis and reporting. This includes responding to feedback at country, regional and global levels. The Consultant is required to provide a detailed timeline in days.
# |
Activity |
Timeline |
Responsible/Deliverables |
01 |
Start Date |
5th, August 2024 |
|
02 |
Inception report |
20th, August 2024 |
|
03 |
Initial Data Review and Plan |
August 23rd, 2024 |
|
04 |
Presentation of Preliminary Findings Report |
August 30th, 2024 |
|
05 |
Draft Report Submission |
Sept 4th, 2024 |
|
06 |
Final Report Submission |
Sept 10th, 2024 |
|
07 |
Final Presentation |
TBD |
|
08 |
Final Submission |
TBD |
|
09 |
Prepare the manuscript ready to publish. |
TBD |
6.7. Qualifications And Obligations
6.7.1. Qualifications of the Consultant or consultancy firm
The consultant who will perform this work should possess a minimum of the following qualifications:
EVALUATION METHOD
6.7.2. Obligations of the consultant and SC Rwanda in Baseline Data Analysis and Report writing
Consultants |
Save the Children |
|
|
6.8. HOW TO APPLY
Part 1: Technical Proposal
This should be in Times New Roman 12, normal page margin and 1.0 line spacing. It should have eight (8) pages maximum and should provide responses to the following questions:
The responses to these questions should not exceed eight pages as said above.
Part 2: Cost Proposal and Work plan (Attachments)
ALL proposals that do not meet the above format will not be considered for evaluation.
6.8.1. How to submit application
Applications should be submitted via e-mail with relevant attachments to juliette.uwimana@savethechildren.org and copy rwanda.supplychain@savethechildren.org before August 26th, 2024, by 23:59hrs. All documents should be zipped in one folder and ensure to note “ZOOSC Project Baseline Data Analysis and Report Writing Consultancy” as the subject of email during submission. Please note that only applications from competent Rwandan consultant(s) or firms/companies will be considered. Individual consultants are required to submit valid copies of their national identity cards or passports while the consulting firms/companies submit their valid copies of business registration certificates. Note that hard copies are not acceptable.
6.8.2. Applications Review Process
Each application will be assessed on the quality of technical proposals, previous work experience, and financial competitiveness. The technical proposal will be reviewed and scored prior to reviewing the financial proposal.
Criterial |
Score |
Comment |
Essential criteria |
Pass or fail |
|
Capability criteria |
30 |
|
Technical Proposal |
30 |
|
Competitive price and appropriate and cost-efficient budget (cost proposal) |
40 |
|
Total Scoring |
100 |
While all applications will be screened and reviewed by the SCI Team, only the top applicants will be invited for face-to-face interview at SC Rwanda Country Office.
Confidentiality: The consultant agrees to maintain the confidentiality of all data and information provided and to use it solely for the purposes of this consultancy.
Prepared by: Approved by: Authorized by:
Ernest Muhirwa Solange UMWIZERWA Maggie Korde
MEAL Manager Project Director Country Director
ZOOSC Project ZOOSC Project SCI Rwanda and Burundi.
Join a Focused Community on job search to uncover both advertised and non-advertised jobs that you may not be aware of. A jobs WhatsApp Group Community can ensure that you know the opportunities happening around you and a jobs Facebook Group Community provides an opportunity to discuss with employers who need to fill urgent position. Click the links to join. You can view previously sent Email Alerts here incase you missed them and Subscribe so that you never miss out.