TOR FOR PROVISION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES
Donor: EMBASSY OF THE KINGDOM OF NETHERLANDS (EKN)
Project Title: CONNECT project
Background Information
The Institute for Community Based Sociotherapy (ICBS) is a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) registered in the Netherlands. The institute works as a global expertise network, uniting professionals, and organizations from different parts of the world that implement communitybased sociotherapy (CBS). CBS has been developed in 2005 in Rwanda, as an integrated Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) and Peacebuilding (PB) approach.
ICBS is implementing the CONNECT project funded by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (EKN) and the coordination of the project is managed through our regional office in Rwanda. This project aims at scaling up the CBS approach in the Great Lakes Region. The project will be implemented by a consortium of four organizations: ICBS in partnership with Community Based Sociotherapy Rwanda (CBS Rwanda), the Anglican Church of Rwanda, Byumba Diocese (E.A.R. Byumba) and Transcultural Psychosocial Organization(TPO) Uganda.
1. Objective of the Audit
The overall objective of the audit is to enable the auditors to express an independent professional opinion on the financial position of the project and to ensure that donor funds have been utilized for their intended purposes and in line with donor rules and regulations. ICBS’S internal policies and guidelines and as well as in compliance with the country of operations statutory requirements.
2. Scope of the Audit
We expect the auditor to have an onsite visit to ICBS partner Country Offices in Rwanda, Uganda and the regional office in Kigali for expenditure review and verification of vouchers.
The audit will be conducted in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing and will include such tests of transactions and tests of the existence, ownership, valuation of assets and liabilities as the auditors consider necessary. They shall obtain an understanding of the accounting and internal control systems to assess their adequacy as a basis for the preparation of the financial reports, and to establish whether proper accounting records have been maintained by the project holder. Special attention shall be given to the fact that income through funds from ICBS and other aid agencies are earmarked funds. This earmarking is based on the objectives/goals and measures defined in the project as well as on the approved expenditure budget and finance plan. The balances of earmarked funds (project balances) shall be shown as liabilities at the end of the accounting period. In addition, the auditors shall analyze the economical and sparing use of funds in accordance with the established local price structures and the contracting practices for placing orders/procurements. The auditors might be required to visit some of the field locations to verify the project assets.
The audit is not designed to identify all significant weaknesses in the project’s systems but, if such significant weaknesses come to the auditors’ notice in the course of the audit process, the auditors shall provide such details in the consolidated audit report of the consortium partners including the lead party separately, or in individual and consolidated Management Letter(s) as appropriate.
3. Specific Audit activities.
The activities described in part A and B must be performed for all consortium partners including the lead party. The activities described in part C must be performed for the lead party. These activities focus on the consolidated report prepared on the basis of the individual reports of the consortium partners and the lead party.
The activities can be summarised as follows:
Activities |
What and for whom |
To be submitted to |
3A. Audit of financial statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework agreement pursuant to standard ISA 805 |
An individual audit opinion on all the consortium partners including the lead party. Activities can be performed by consortium partner’s own regular auditor. |
Lead party |
3B. Engagement to perform agreed-upon procedures pursuant to ISRS 4400 |
For all consortium partners including the lead party: an individual report (including descriptions of the consortium partner as mentioned in part B). Activities can be performed by consortium partner’s own regular auditor. |
Lead party and Ministry |
3C. Engagement to perform agreed-upon procedures pursuant to ISRS 4400 (lead party) |
Report of findings on a consolidated report prepared by the lead party concerning the consortium partners’ individual audit opinions and reports on factual findings. |
Ministry |
As part of the standard audit procedures, the auditors may request the project managers to provide written confirmation of certain oral representations which they may have received during the audit on matters having a material effect on the annual financial statement. For the auditors to proceed smoothly with the examination, they shall request sight of all documents or statements, which are due to be issued with the annual financial statement.
The responsibility for safeguarding the assets of the project holder and the responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud, error and non-compliance with law or regulations rests with the project managers. However, the auditors shall endeavor to plan their audit to provide reasonable assurance of detecting material misstatements in the annual financial statement or accounting records (including those resulting from fraud, error or non-compliance with law or regulations).
The aim of the audit of the financial statements is to establish whether they meet the requirements laid down in the standards framework. The auditor must ascertain that:
4. Materiality
The auditor will seek reasonable assurance which, when the statistical sampling method is used, means a minimum reliability level of 95%. In other words, the auditor will plan and perform the audit to obtain this level of assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements and/or uncertainties.
The following materiality levels apply when performing the audit.
Benchmark |
Materiality |
Reported expenditures/costs |
2% |
Type of audit opinion |
Unqualified |
Qualified |
Disclaimer |
Adverse |
Accounting errors and uncertainties in the audit |
≤2% |
> 2% - ≤ 4% |
Uncertainties > 4% |
Errors > 4% |
If the auditor encounters both accounting errors and uncertainties in the audit while performing the audit, the errors and uncertainties should always be considered individually and together when drawing up the audit opinion.
5. Deliverables
At the end of the exercise, the auditor will be expected to provide the following for consortium partners including the lead party separately and consolidated report;
Time Frame of Audit Exercise
The auditors will complete the exercise on time and submit the report (including the documents mentioned above) to reach ICBS within 3 weeks from date of contracting.
Desired Profile of the Auditor(s)
6. Audit Proposed Fees (Benchmark for fees)
Please provide an estimate of fees for the services to be provided. The fees should have a breakdown of amounts or can be written in the form of percentages with the various below thresholds.
S/N |
Expenditures Category (Eur) |
Amount (A) |
Other Fees(B) |
Total (A+B) |
Type |
Amount |
|||
1 |
€50,000-€200,000 |
|||
2 |
€200,000-€500,000 |
|||
3 |
€500,000-€700,000 |
|||
4 |
€700,000-€1000,000 |
|||
5 |
€1000,000-€1500,000 |
|||
6 |
€1500,000-€2000,000 |
|||
7 |
€2,000,000-€4,000,000 |
|||
8 |
Above €4,000,000 |
Any cost incurred for traveling to the ICBS partners/field offices by auditors is boundby the auditors themselves and to be included in other types of fees.
7. Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated in two parts. The technical proposal shall bear 60% of the total marks while the financial proposal shall bear 40% of the total marks.
N0 |
Description |
Weight |
1 |
Experience, Skills and Ability of Service Provider
References Did the bidder submit at least three relevant and contactable clients that were serviced in the past 12 months? |
40 |
2 |
Technical Approach and Execution Plan Proposals must contain the details of the proposed approach to be adopted in order to deliver the service in accordance with the TOR. |
20 |
3 |
Project management
|
15 |
4 |
Capacity Proposals should clearly indicate whether or not bid participants have the capacity to meet the requirements of the TOR. |
25 |
TOTAL |
100 |
Bidders are required to score a minimum of 75% points on functionality to qualify to be evaluated in the next level (price). Bidders who do not score the minimum of 75% points on functionality will be disqualified and not be evaluated on price.
Locations
The audit is expected to take place in the ICBS and partners’ offices in Rwanda (Kigali and Gicumbi) and Uganda. The auditor may sample beneficiaries and make call back verifications if necessary.
How to apply
Bid Requirements
The bidders should provide the following documents in their application.
Applications should be addressed to ICBS not later than 2nd August, 2024 at 05:00pm, by submitting one copy of bid documents including technical and financial proposal showing all details as required in technical specifications. Interested audit firms should send the specified documents to the below email address with the subject line of the email body; Provision of Audit Services. tender@icbs.ngo
Join a Focused Community on job search to uncover both advertised and non-advertised jobs that you may not be aware of. A jobs WhatsApp Group Community can ensure that you know the opportunities happening around you and a jobs Facebook Group Community provides an opportunity to discuss with employers who need to fill urgent position. Click the links to join. You can view previously sent Email Alerts here incase you missed them and Subscribe so that you never miss out.